Erez Zadok wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Shaya Potter writes:
the same can seemingly be applied to rename, as a whiteout would
presumambly have to be created in some situatins, but I don't see where
that is? Since it didnt affect what I needed, didn't look too hard into it.
The rename functionality in unionfs is quite involved. You need to take a
deep breath before diving into it. :-)
yes, I know. haven't wanted to scratch out my eyes yet.
As an aside, can someone from the FSL try to redo my benchmarks to see
if they can recreate my numbers that unionfs + base is faster than base.
As that should be impossible. Jason would never let me publish
numbers that say that without a good, unhand wavey, reason. I'm
guessing you have some experience w/ that :)
_______________________________________________
unionfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
