In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Shaya Potter writes: > Erez Zadok wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Shaya Potter writes: > >> the same can seemingly be applied to rename, as a whiteout would > >> presumambly have to be created in some situatins, but I don't see where > >> that is? Since it didnt affect what I needed, didn't look too hard into > >> it. > > > > The rename functionality in unionfs is quite involved. You need to take a > > deep breath before diving into it. :-) > > yes, I know. haven't wanted to scratch out my eyes yet. > > As an aside, can someone from the FSL try to redo my benchmarks to see > if they can recreate my numbers that unionfs + base is faster than base. > As that should be impossible. Jason would never let me publish > numbers that say that without a good, unhand wavey, reason. I'm > guessing you have some experience w/ that :)
I don't mind Josef has time and can run PM here. Erez. _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
