On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 02:29:14PM -0500, Shaya Potter wrote: > Shaya Potter wrote: > >Josef Sipek wrote: > >>On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 01:04:22PM -0500, Shaya Potter wrote: > >>>Josef Sipek wrote: > >>>>On a more general level, what has higher priority a whiteout or a file? > >>>whiteout, if it's 'valid' (i.e. serves a purpose) to exist, as all my > >>>code does is skip whiteout searching if it doesn't matter if it exists. > >> > >>If whiteout is the higher priority object, then readdir should not > >>display > >>the file created under these circumstances. => pushing the "problem" to > >>readdir :) > > > >true, though readdir could ignore it in the right situations as well :) > > I looked at unionfs_readdir() and am unsure how to get it to ignore > whiteouts that can be ignored, it should be in unionfs_filldir(),
Right. My readdir comment was more of a readdir(2) comment, rather then unionfs_readdir. > unsure how to do it (never really bothered much w/ the readdir code > before as it mostly worked just fine). It looks like it would require somewhat complex matching. :-/ Jeff. -- Note 96.3% of all statistics are fiction. _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
