On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 11:27:12AM -0500, Shaya Potter wrote:
> Josef Sipek wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 11:13:15AM -0500, Shaya Potter wrote:
> >>Josef Sipek wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 11:28:21AM -0500, Shaya Potter wrote:
> >>>>Here's my optimization patch (quick and dirty, looks bigger than it is, 
> >>>>most of it is changing indenting of already existing code within if() 
> >>>>statements I added)  w/ postmark numbers.  I'm a little confused as now 
> >>>>unionfs on backing store is faster than plain backing store (albiet not 
> >>>>many test iterations and my methodology might be suspect, any thoughts?)
> >>>Hrm, I just tried to run the regression suite on the patched code (which 
> >>>got
> >>>commited last night) and it failed on create.sh. I am looking into it 
> >>>now.
> >>the bug is (I beleive, haven't tested it yet) that I did bstart != bend 
> >>based on dentry
> > 
> >The symptom is that we are not removing whiteouts on create. The first test
> >case of create.sh leaves 2 whiteouts behind:
> >
> >/n/lower/b0/d1/.wh.x
> >/n/lower/b2/d1/d2/d3/d4/.wh.d
> > 
> >>except that dentry in this case is the entry we want to create.
> >
> >That dentry should still have the right b{start,end,opaque}, as someone
> >looked it up, no?
> 
> no, remember unionfs operates on namespaces not data.  Directories are 
> namespaces, files are data.
> 
> I've fixed the first case by switching to getting the data from the 
> parent.  (patch attached)
 
Ack.
 
> However, it doesn't fix the d4 case, as d4 only exists in one branch, so 
> the whiteout is somewhat pointless, as there's nothing to white out. (in 
> the b0/d1 case, b1/d1 contained an x directory so the whiteout 
> accomplished something)

Yes, the whiteout is pointless, but the situation can occur by
adding/removing branches.

> also, all your regressions scripts are bash dependent, so should use 
> /bin/bash, not /bin/sh

Good point. Just commited a fix.

Jeff.

-- 
Don't drink and derive. Alcohol and algebra don't mix.
_______________________________________________
unionfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs

Reply via email to