On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 03:24 -0400, Erez Zadok wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Vasily Tarasov writes: > > Hello everybody, > > > > Can you tell me, please, is there ETA for unionfs 1.6 (against 2.6.20 > > kernel)? It's marked as "coming soon" on the web-site... > > > > Thank you, > > Vasily. > > Vasily, we've done even better: we've back-ported Unionfs 2.0 to 2.6.20 (as > well as 2.6.19, 2.6.18, and 2.6.21). See > <http://unionfs.filesystems.org/>. Please let us know how well these > back-ports work for you. > > Cheers, > Erez.
Thank you, Erez. However we needed Unionfs 1.0. :) The thing is that we're creating OpenVZ (openvz.org) LiveCD, that will able to boot from several kernels: 2.6.9, 2.6.18 and 2.6.20. The LiveCD uses unionctl tool and it works great for 2.6.9/2.6.18 kernels, because we use unionfs 1.0 for these kernels. But unionfs 2.0, that is only available for 2.6.20 kernel, doesn't support ioctls that unionctl produces. :) Well, I guess you will not do the 1.0 port to 2.6.20 only for us, so I'll try to find some reasonable workarond. :) Thank you anyway, Vasily _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list: http://unionfs.filesystems.org/ [email protected] http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
