In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Beyerle Urs writes:
> Erez Zadok wrote:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Vasily Tarasov writes:

> Does this mean that unionfs 2.0 should work for 2.6.9 kernel ???
> 
> > Or maybe I'll now have to see if we can backport the 2.6.18 code to 2.6.9?
> > That's going to be an interesting adventure. :-)
> 
> I'm still looking forward for a stable unionfs version for 2.6.9 RHEL
> kernel! Any work on this would be very much appreciated!!
> 
> Cheers,
> 
>       Urs

Urs, it's on my list to try and backport unionfs2 to 2.6.9-vanilla.

Stay tuned.

Erez.
_______________________________________________
unionfs mailing list: http://unionfs.filesystems.org/
[email protected]
http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs

Reply via email to