Everything I have previously read about the proposed historic district said that there were no tax incentives. What are these tax incentives that the Inquirer reporter mentions?
Jeff Abrahamson wrote: > On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 12:12:52PM -0500, R a y R o r k e wrote: > > Richard Welter wrote: > > >I can say this, I was at the meeting on Tuesday night when Al proposed that > > >someone from SHCA come to the debate, and they refused, saying they found > > >the current process that the Historic Society used to be sufficient. They > > >claim no other venue is needed. > > > > > > > > no other venue is needed? then why are grossbach and krigman and > > hardy talking to reporters? > > > > http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/local/2787535.htm > > Which includes some interesting quotes: > > A local designation would protect that texture by giving the > Historical Commission authority to approve or reject permits for > any and all exterior work and demolitions. It also would make > available tax incentives to landlords and businesses for > rehabilitation work. > > -- > Jeff > > Jeff Abrahamson <http://www.purple.com/jeff/> > > The Big Book of Misunderstanding, now in bookstores and on the web: > <http://www.misunderstanding.net/buystuff.html> > > ---- > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the > list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see > <http://www.purple.com/list.html>. -- Richard Hotchkiss http://www.hotstrings-inc.com ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
