C J Card wrote:
>7. When SHNA distributes flyers, urging more
>
>people to attend the
>
>meeting, the advocates _tear down_ these posters
>
>within hours.
>
> Sounds like speculation. Do you have specific examples?
>
Sure, I postered the areas between 43rd and 44th and Osage and
Larchwood, and on a path to the Fresh Grocer. A few hours later, I had
to hit the store again later that day, and most of the posters I'd put
up were torn down. (The advocates' posters were still up.) Unles you can
offer a better explanation, I'd knock off the "sounds like speculation"
comments.
>Let's be blunt here, friends and neighbors--
>
>these are the people who
>
>feel it's their right to give away your property
>
>rights even when
>
>they're making every effort to prevent you from
>
>hearing any objections.
>
>
> Tonight you can let Jannie know how you feel. And I for one say, it is
> about time. My block captain said to me last night that she is hard
> pressed to think of more than a handful of people screaming on the
> list serve against this. Some screaming voices don't even live in the
> proposed boundaries. Tonight, I am going to listening to the facts and
> weigh the pros and cons.
>
"Some screaming voices don't even live in the proposed boundaries?"
Listen, Mr. "Sounds like Speculation," would you care to provide any
_names_ to back up this accusation? I live in the boundaries. Al Krigman
does. Sharrieff Ali does. Liz Campion does. All of the people I known
through the SHNA live in the boundaries.
Maybe you ought to check your facts before posting.
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
