What you are describing constitutes illegal behavior, regardless of the
composition of the household or whether the perpetrators are actually
residents or occasional visitors. The solution is to deal with the
behavior at the time it occurs, not to penalize a class of occupants
because the anecdotal evidence indicates that some times a household in
that particular class causes that sort problem. Particularly since the
evidence indicates that traditional type of households also cause
problems, that often the group homes do not cause any problems and
indeed can be very good neighbors, and that there is a mechanism to deal
with the illegal behavior.
Gerardo Razumney
HarvestMoon3 wrote:
>
[snip]
> parties with hundreds of people
> spilling onto the street, thrown beer bottles, vomited and urinated on
> neighbors' properties, yelled wildly outdoors until 4 AM. Yet, this has
> occurred on my block and others, at the various "group homes". This sort of
> behavior is self-limiting to an extent when the number of "unrelateds" in a
> house is limited. So, yes, the character of the occupants does affect
> quality of life for others nearby.
>
> Neil Lifson
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
