there probably aren't any more than sixty cats that make up the walnut hill feral population. i'm certian we could do something about it. it's probably a lot easier than getting my neighbors to stop throwing chicken bones in my yard. (last summer they actually left an entire chicken _carcass_ on my front step. i have a photo of it, but i'll do you all a favor and not post it).
feralcat.com says game wardens "shoot thousands of cats a year". that seems a bit extreme. kc -----Original Message----- From: William Zardus To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 4/2/2004 6:21 PM Subject: RE: [UC] Stray Cats Off the top of my head, I'd say eliminating access to garbage is probably just as realistic as "solving" the stray cat problem. My point was that not only is that NEVER going to happen but if it did, we probably wouldn't like the results. What city doesn't have stray cats ? WRZ PS - I hope you have dinner ready if you're wasting time on this forum. ----Original Message Follows---- From: "Christy Bracken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [UC] Stray Cats Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 15:42:40 -0500 I think the study Kyle mentioned was based on REALITY. What kind of idealistic urban environment would it be if one could "eliminate access to garbage over an extended period"? Impossible. How on earth could you possibly enforce such a thing in a city this size, or even a smaller one such as Baltimore (where the study was conducted)? <snip> _________________________________________________________________ Get rid of annoying pop-up ads with the new MSN Toolbar - FREE! http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200414ave/direct/01/ ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>. ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
