David, Actually, I think that's what will probably happen. When it does, the city will claim they didn't know about the problems with dogs in the bowl. However, the city will probably be ultimately liable because they are the deepest pocket, and had the means to control the problem.
I know from being there at at least one child has hurt themselves in the uncompleted section of the playground. I also heard from some of the other parents of a child who gashed their head and was taken to CHOP. Parents are responsible for the safety of their children, and many parents let their children either come to the park unsupervised, or let their children play on the uncompleted equipment. The latter to me seems like natural selection in action, but the City could be held liable for letting the situation exist, and not exercising sufficeint oversight. Bottom Line: We are all affected. Our taxes go up because of liability issues, and our kids and neighbors kids get hurt. bga In a message dated 6/24/2004 5:47:57 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >The city doesn't care about liability. Mainly because no one PERSON ever feels > >the pinch. Otherwise they would have done something about the free range > >doggies in the park. > > > >I'm waiting for the day some one gets mauled in the park. Now that's a lawsuit > >waiting to happen. > > > Talk about all whine and no cheeze. The above takes the > cake. > > D ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
