Say what? I am the first to publish that the boundaries, as defined by the 
Philadelphia City Planning Commission, have changed. Can you cite an earlier 
publication?

The stickers are indeed placed in their appropriate Planning Analysis Sector. I 
did not know there were new PCPC definitions for our community; I was 
accustomed to the previous rules, according to which the stickers were 
inaccurate.

In the most precise possible words, the stickers are in West Philadelphia if 
many folks feel they are; at the same time, and of equal truth, they are in 
University City if many folks feel they are.

But a designation like "West Philly" is much bigger than a neighborhood 
designation and cannot contrast with or replace a neighborhood designation. To 
put another way: it makes no sense to say,

"THIS IS WEST PHILLY
Haddington / Dunlap / Mill Creek / Mantua is a marketing scheme."

They aren't marketing schemes. They are well-known and long-established 
neighborhoods that are part of West Philadelphia, which is far too big to be a 
neighborhood in itself. It's not a neighborhood name and hasn't been for 100 
years.

-- Tony West
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Frank 
  To: Anthony West ; [email protected] 
  Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 5:38 AM
  Subject: Re: [UC] Be true to your Planning Analysis Sector (Was: New 
Marketing Campaign)


  In other, more concise words, you were wrong and the stickers are indeed in 
West Philadelphia. There. That was easy, wasn't it? One simple sentence. 


  By the way, "all the fuss" was mostly *you* refusing to admit that the 
boundaries, in their fluidity, had changed.


  Frank

Reply via email to