I am glad you brought up graffiti which is the usual vandalism medium
used by 
"Turks" and "Punks" popular during the 60's. 
 
This is all a puzzle, designed to puzzle you!  But..is it really so hard
to figure out? 
 
The universities, and lets be truthful here, mostly Penn, have taken
this area for their 
own with incredible amounts of money..year after year after year. To
those of us who 
are connected and informed it is overwhelming, can you imagine what it
must be like 
for those who don't have any connection or real options?
 
What we are witnessing is the usual power struggle between "the
establishment" and
the "anti-establishment". Right now in West Philly there are multiple
sub-cultures who
communicate through stickers, flyers, posters, and pole-signs. The
sub-culture groups
are organizing and having events supporting issues that are
anti-establishment, recycling, 
veganism, reducing global warming and dependency on oil..etc.  Do you
think they are 
happy to see UCD removing all of their communication materials?  
 
The people who are behind the stickers (I suspect) do not support what
they view as 
gentrification or as Melani remarked..loosing a cheap place to live and
work which they
have been enjoying here in West Philly for years. They relate to the
area as "West Philly"
it would be against their code to submit to the "marketing" and call it
University City or
to try and understand the values of UCD.
 
Vandalism is a social shock treatment, graffiti, riots, looting, and yes
the dreaded word
"terrorism" all designed to break the laws and get your attention
focused on their issues.
 
What we are seeing now is just the by-product of all the years of
aggressive development 
and marketing of gentrification, It threatens people, and people strike
back.
 
S
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Doc Baldy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2007 8:04 PM
To: S. Sharrieff Ali
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Kyle Cassidy; Anthony West
Subject: Re: [UC] New Marketing Campaign
 
> WHY the whoever is doing it and WHAT they are really trying to say.
I completely agree with you but when people hide behind stickers placed
on street signs and private property, how do we figure out what they are
trying to say?  Are we really obligated or should we even listen to
people how are hiding behind graffiti (ie vandalizing the Clark Park
signs)?  If we do take them seriously then are we saying it's ok to
vandalize and that's a valid mechanism for expressing one's opinion?  If
someone doesn't like a new business that opens up, is it ok for them to
vandalize the business?  If they do vandalize the business, should we
stop to consider what they are really trying to say? 
 
I'm trying to understand this.  I've asked lots of people about the
issue (UC vs West Philly) and I've yet to find anyone (white or black)
who thinks it's anything but a stupid or silly effort "this is Univ City
and it's within West Philly...who cares".  Obviously someone cares but
who and why?  It seems like we're assuming it's a movement which to me
implies it's lots of people.  What if it's just 1 person?  

My best guess is that it's some sort of anti-UCD thing.  What if UCD
were called West Philly District.  Would be expect the sticks to say
"This is Philadelphia, West Philly is just a marketing sheme"? 

Take care,
Stephen



On 4/8/07, S. Sharrieff Ali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Melani, I think your right, it is clearly not the senior population
complaining, their too 
busy playing bingo and gossiping to care about what UCD is doing! 
 
I do not agree with defacing private property to make political
statements, there are 
other ways to broadcast. Someone put a Bob Brady lawn sign in my yard
without my 
permission last week and I didn't like that either.
 
I wouldn't focus on the stickers being on private property or how much
they cost to
produce as much as WHY the whoever is doing it and WHAT they are really
trying
to say. This stuff is not going away any time soon, we need to figure
out a way to 
understand it and incorporate the sentiments into our planning. I don't
think it is healthy
to dismiss what we don't fully agree with as a bunch of crazy people who
have no claim
to the rights of residency.
 
S
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2007 11:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [UC] New Marketing Campaign
 

In a message dated 4/8/07 4:57:47 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The debate started with stickers and banners, the question is why were
they placed?
I could relate to the sentiment if the stickers were being placed by the
now-elderly folks who made this place "home" for all or most of their
lives, since back before the term "University City" was popularized in
the late-50s - early 60s.  Some of my neighbors are in that group.  If
those folks were rising up and crying "ENOUGH," then I'd want to hear
what they had to say.  I think that they have more claim to the
neighborhood than those of us who grew up here later and/or arrived
later.  But, I haven't heard these anti-UC feelings expressed by my
elderly neighbors - ever.  And I doubt that the elderly folks would
suddenly taken up this sort of vandalism, even if they felt this way.  

I suspect that the stickers were placed by young punks, Trustafarians,
young recent arrivals, who want to see  the neighborhood be cheap and
down for their own selfish reasons, so that they can continue to live
here even though they live on allowances and/or don't hold full-time
jobs.  THE STICKERS are a marketing campaign.

There's nothing wrong with living on allowances and/or not holding
full-time jobs, but there is something wrong with illegally defacing
other peoples' property with stickers, and with feeling that upstarts
can march through the place that such a diverse population calls "home,"
and tell all of us how we must refer to it.

Melani Lamond
University City resident since 1971





Melani Lamond, Associate Broker
Urban & Bye, Realtor
3529 Lancaster Ave.
Philadelphia, PA 19104 
cell phone 215-356-7266 
office phone 215-222-4800, ext. 113
office fax 215-222-1101


**************************************
See what's free at http://www.aol.com.



-- 

----------------------------------
University City Yoga
http://www.ucyoga.com 

Reply via email to