CM and all:  below is a private post which came to me. I am posting it
without 
the persons name, I think the comments are relevant to the discussion. I
hope
the person who sent it will not feel betrayed.
 
My goal is not to hunt down anyone who "could" be responsible. I hoped
we could
figure out ways of preventing the lost of other trees. I believe there
is room
for additional city regulations and perhaps coordination of tree related
programs
such as UC-Green.
 
S
 
>>>Listen, I am not sure finding the person responsible for this is
going to work.
 
 
>>>The tree I looked closely at fell because the root structure did not
extend under 
Walnut Street. It appeared to me that the curb and poor soil under the
street 
prevented that from happening
 
>>>The other problem was that the tree was planted on top of a sandy /
clay soil. 
When I looked in the hole next to the trunk it was full of water.
Without a 
proper root structure (think of the root flare as the foot of the tree)

to support the weight of the tree and the saturated soil underneath -
the 
side of the trunk closest to the tree actually sunk into the ground and
the 
trees tipped towards the street.
 
>>>The life of a tree depends on its environment. If you ever walk
through an 
unmanaged forest you will see that most trees grow up and then fall
down. 
you might see a tree that died and rotted in place (generally as they
rot 
they shed large branches). Trees grow taller in protected places with
good 
soil and less wind. Trees don't grow as tall elsewhere.
 
>>>I think this was a situation where the trees simply out grew their
environment. 
They would have come down anyway because they were simply too big.
 
>>It is clear to be that this is a Catch 22.
 
>>>1. If the city cuts down all of the really big beautiful trees that
pose a risk 
of falling on something or wrecking the sidewalks - people will be
unhappy because 
they are cutting trees down.
 
>>>2. If the city leaves the trees alone and they grow big and beautiful
and the trees 
sometime wreck the sidewalks, cause people to trip and occasionally fall
on people, 
homes and cars - then people will want to blame someone.
 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cindy Miller
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 8:36 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [UC] Trees 
 
All this talk about trees makes me think of how unappreciated and taken
for granted that they are. 

Cement up to the trunk, shallow root pits, chopping off roots to make
the sidewalk lay flat...Ugh! Or the trees on our block that were
butchered last fall because they were in the way of the power
lines.....Street trees really have to fight for survival, IMO they
should be revered!

Maybe it's easier not to consider their importance when the temperatures
are still cool, but there's nothing like the shade of a tree when it's
stinkin' hot on a city street .
And the oxygen they add to the air, and the pollutants they offset, the
earth their root systems keep in place and....etc., etc., etc.

I would hope that the city (and it citizens) stop taking trees for
granted and realize just how precious these natural resources are. 

Perhaps an awareness campaign? (I like to think that people just don't
know...and that's why trees are abused.)


-cm






On Monday, April 23, 2007, at 12:14 AM, Elizabeth F Campion wrote:
 
Dear Craig,
 
Thanks for the info, but it might be important to know that the city
does not cede the right of walkway to the existence of or desire for
trees.
Most residential blocks in the city require a paved walkway that is 5'
wide.
Many commercial blocks require more width.  The largest requirement that
I have seen is 17'.
 
This explains why some property owners make tree lawns, in the hope that
a longer ribbon of earth might permit sufficient area for the delivery
of water and air to tree roots.
 
Best!
Liz
 
 
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:44:06 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

In a message dated 4/22/2007 7:29:30 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Someone private-mailed me and accused me of  "dime-dropping" on the
"whoever" 

withL&I and asked me to post a clarification.

Are you stating a participant on this listserv tried to intimidate you
with the threat of Don't Snitch? How sad. Out the weenie, SAli.
 
L&I codes are meant to support a reasonable and decent quality of life
for the general populace.

... I plan to check withL&I to see what the regulations are, what forms
are used.

There are reasonable practices meant to maximize tree viability in urban
settings.

. No pavement shall be laid within an area of three (3) feet by four (4)
feet around the base of the trunk of any such tree nor shall any stone,
gravel, cement, lumber, or other material be deposited upon such area.

Private Contractors. Any person engaged in the business of planting,
removing, spraying, pruning, bark tracing, and root pruning of street
trees in the City of Philadelphia shall comply with the following rules
and regulations relating to the proper performance of said work:

. He/she shall obtain a permit before performing any work on the street
trees in the City.
. He/she shall sign an agreement whereby he/she will agree to hold the
City of Philadelphia and the Commission harmless from any and all claims
of whatever nature arising from damage of property or injury to any
persons, however caused, through the exercise of said permit either by
himself/herself, his/her agent, servant, or employee.
. He/she shall obtain comprehensive liability insurance for injury to
any person or persons and for damage to any property, in such amount as
the Commission may require.
. A certificate of insurance evidencing such coverage shall be placed on
file with the Commission.
. He/she shall perform the work described above in good, workmanlike
fashion, and in addition, shall comply with the published regulations
for the care of street trees issued by the Commission.

General guidelines are available at
http://www.fairmountpark.org/StreetTree.asp

  I think man had a hand in this one.


By keeping his hand in his pocket instead of spending money to the do
the job right the first time.
 
For over 30 years Stoneleigh has been a real estate gateway to hell and
anguish in West Philly. The city stops responding when people stop
complaining, because a cash strapped city hopes the private sector will
remediate this valuable piece of real estate. In 1980 Court of Common
Pleas almost seized the property, while the DA was prosecuting the owner
for a plethora of significant code violations.
 
Ever wonder why the exterior rain conductors still aren't connected to
the DWV lines?
 
It is a shame the building suffers from inept management.
 
Craig Melidosian
Past President
Fairmount Park Commission Advisory Council





<image.tiff>

See what's free at AOL.com.
 


Elizabeth Campion                               Cell Phone: 215-880-2930
215-546-0550 Main, -546-9871 fax,  Desk + VM: 215-790-5653
PRUDENTIAL, FOX & ROACH REALTORS, LLC
Please read Consumer Notice & enjoy "HOME PILOT" tools at
                             www.PruFoxRoach.com


Reply via email to