There's no doubt you're largely right about both race and TV, Sharrieff. But I 
do see signs the latter factor is weakening as a vote-driver in 2007.

It's not clear who's supporting Nutter now, after his TV blitz, but his early 
grassroots support base was largely white. Knox has clearly nibbled away a 
chunk of man-on-the-street Black voters.

At the level of peers in the political process, Fattah has picked up 
endorsements from a few majority-white unions and professional groups. Evans 
has rock-solid support from most fellow state legislators, regardless of race. 
Brady enjoys real (as opposed to titular) backing from half the city's African 
American ward leaders, I'd say, and his massive union base is far from being 
the lily-white bastion it was 20 years ago. And Knox just picked up a most 
interesting ally in West Philadelphia's Blackwell clan.

When it's one white guy against one Black guy, then yeah, everybody roots for 
the home team. But a five-man race starts to break that down. It is pleasant to 
see this. When the numbers turn into concrete on May 15, we'll want to see how 
far deracializing actually went.

As for the TV -- no such progress on that front. Increasingly, people vote for 
what they see on the tube.

-- Tony West

  From: S. Sharrieff Ali 


  Well.what I am hearing is the voters are looking at race and not 
qualifications or agenda,

  and yeah-buddy it pretty much has worked that way on both sides for quite 
some time! 

   

  Most voters couldn't tell you anything about the candidates other than what 
they have heard 

  on a TV commercial. I made a few hundred calls for Chaka Fattah in a few 
wards and many 

  voters were undecided, couldn't name all the candidates, hadn't done any 
research, and if 

  they picked a candidate..they had a superficial reason for doing so.

   

  What does that say about the process? The mayor's election is a popularity 
contest among

  a bunch of uninformed voters driven by TV ads and race (color). 

   AOL.com.

Reply via email to