"totally for meaningless exchange"   "able to articulate"
 
 
I asked listers to examine how newspapers endorsing candidates
were set up to influence public opinion going into the polls. If
someone benefits, there is always a pay-off.
 
As you have seen with the issue of campaign limits, I believe you
will see newspaper endorsements examined as well. 
 
I am not influenced by newspaper endorsements, however, they
make a great place to lay crabs.
 
S
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 9:17 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [UC] Newspaper Endorsements ... "Pay-To Say"
 
      Whoa, I thought the prior responses dealt with all of your
questions.  Look at it this way, assuming your argument is not totally
for meaningless exchange, how do you propose to implement your proposed
policy, i.e. to ban newspapers from endorsing candidates, supporting or
opposing legislation, criticizing court decisions, or advocating for
public policy?  If you are able to articulate a system to accomplish
this that you can live with, let us know, and then there is something
real to talk about.

Paul
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Fri, 11 May 2007 8:00 PM
Subject: RE: [UC] Newspaper Endorsements ... "Pay-To Say"
Thanks Wilma:
 
I hope everyone understands I don't mean payments "literally", like a
fee-sheet.
 
One hand washing the other. Editorial boards should present commentary,
but
not endorse.
 
to approve openly <endorse an idea>; especially : 
to express support or approval of publicly and definitely 
<endorse a mayoral candidate> b : to recommend 
(as a product or service) usually for financial compensation 
<shoes endorsed by a pro basketball player>
 
I see no one is answering the questions.
 
S
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <javascript:parent.ComposeTo(>  [
<javascript:parent.ComposeTo(> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Wilma de Soto
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 6:48 PM
To: S. Sharrieff Ali; 'Joshua Karstendick'
Cc: UnivCity listserv
Subject: Re: [UC] Newspaper Endorsements ... "Pay-To Say"
 
It has ALWAYS been thus, ever since there have been newspapers.  No help
for it.

The Editorial pages were created for just those issues that concern the
general public; also editorial cartoonist of which I feel Tony Auth is
one of the greatest.

Advertisers do not USUALLY dictate newspaper editorial policy as they do
when they pay for advertising time on TV and Product Placement in
pictures.  If they do there is usually a disclaimer in fine print at the
end of the advert. 

I would know because Alex is in that business.

However, I could be wrong, but THAT was what the newspaper business
thrived upon.  The Philadelphia Inquirer is one of the oldest Public
Newspapers in the U.S.

All sorts of companies take out advertisements for all sorts of reasons
including political reasons; however endorsements of the Editorial Board
are not usually bought, but are opinions of same.


On 5/11/07 4:38 PM, "S. Sharrieff Ali" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<javascript:parent.ComposeTo(> > wrote:
Let mew say it again. 
 
Newspapers should not endorse candidates.
 
1.    Why should they? 
2.    Why is it important for a newspaper to use its might against a
candidate to sway voter opinion and turn-out?
3.    Are payments made."Pay-to-Say"? 
4.    Why is reporting all sides of an issue not enough?
5.    How does a newspaper benefit from an endorsement?
6.    If a newspaper is going to endorse a candidate, how does a
candidate
posture themselves in anticipation?
 
There where many people who thought it was a better idea to have local
papers not endorse.
 
In my opinion, there is no separation between editorial and news. The
perception is they are the same. When a paper endorses a candidate, the
paper uses its collective might and does not make the distinction known.
 
S
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Joshua Karstendick [ <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 2:44 PM
To: S. Sharrieff Ali
Cc: [email protected] <javascript:parent.ComposeTo(> 
Subject: Re: [UC] Newspaper Endorsements ... "Pay-To Say"
 
The editorial page is separate from news reporting. Newspapers can and
do both endorse candidates and provide high quality, unbiased news.
 
There is also a wall of separation between advertisers and the newsroom.
 
On 5/11/07, S. Sharrieff Ali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<javascript:parent.ComposeTo(> > wrote:
>
>
>
> Newspapers should not support candidates, they should report
>
> the news and remain unbiased.
>
>
>
> So if the newspapers are advertising based, then how much do
>
> they charge for an endorsement?
>
>
>
> S
 
 
 
  _____  

AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free
from AOL at  <http://www.aol.com?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000437> AOL.com.

Reply via email to