In a message dated 5/24/2007 4:37:12 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 5/24/2007 4:24:48 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yeah..but that is the point Al..Did someone file a complaint and if so where or what is the evidence? And..If so ..than why not just say so? I have no idea whether anybody has, at this point. But, consistent with my belief that we should not be rushing to judgement, I may do so when the details of the "internal investigation" are released. Details including procedures as well as findings. Or, if the details are not released. Why pretend to wait? In a message dated 5/24/2007 11:28:35 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: We DO know that UCD has not been forthright or transparent about discussing this issue in the open. And while some aspects of the issue this might have been acceptable to safeguard the privacy and other rights of John Fenton before Channel 6 identified him (the DN, as I recall, didn't name names), once he had been "outed" UCD could have gone totally public. So, if this is what we're "judging," the evidence is in. And UCD is guilty. Bruce McCullough ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
