Look at what West suggests: "But to bash it for steps it was virtually compelled to take ... that strikes me as unfair and stupid."
He is asserting according to this wanker "manual" that he made up, that UCD was "compelled" to immediately fire John Fenton and lock him out. West, did the manual require UCD to lie about a 2 week suspension? Does the wanker "manual" demand that they immediately impose a gag order on Mr. Fenton and bar him from talking to his former employees or anyone else? Here we go again with straw man: "If you think it could have easily have done differently, cite a case in your experience where an employer, faced with a similarly explosive employee investigation, handled it better in your opinion. If you have no real-world knowledge how an agency has handled this differently, just say so. The time for bluster and baloney is over. Don't fake knowledge when a real man's livelihood is at stake. -- Tony West" This "fake knowledge," "bluster and baloney," and "when a real man's livelihood is at stake" is just Wanker West's usual technique. Wanker now knows that Mr. Fenton was fired long ago and these accusations are both mean and absurd. Look at what he quotes from me to support this attack. Melani loves this kind of crap so I guess we will get one of those "thank you Tony" posts. Wank away dude! posts----- Original Message ----- From: Anthony West To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 11:03 PM Subject: Re: [UC] Reality check That's right. That's normal. And that's standard. Which is not to say I like it. But that's standard operating procedure for management dismissals and suspension in corporate America these days. There's something close to a manual for it. The manager who doesn't follow the manual can be accused of malfeasance, as can his employer. This is not a manual I would ever have written; but there it is. It's one thing to bash UCD for things it might have done differently. But to bash it for steps it was virtually compelled to take ... that strikes me as unfair and stupid. If you think it could have easily have done differently, cite a case in your experience where an employer, faced with a similarly explosive employee investigation, handled it better in your opinion. If you have no real-world knowledge how an agency has handled this differently, just say so. The time for bluster and baloney is over. Don't fake knowledge when a real man's livelihood is at stake. -- Tony West Melani is trying to assert that those of us whom have been critical of UCD caused the harm to John Fenton while UCD is blameless. Folks, the reports we heard today suggest that John was barred almost immediately. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.11/837 - Release Date: 6/6/2007 2:03 PM
