----- Original Message ----- 
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [email protected] 
  Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2007 9:58 AM
  Subject: Re: [UC] Press release or Wendell statement?



  In a message dated 6/15/07 8:26:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

    Generally the question is : “Why is Lewis Wendell
    more responsible?
     
    Well..the answer is if it was a Board decision to
    suspend John then I guess we would have all known
    about it from the meeting held by our community
    representatives on the UCD Board.



  Let's see:  you're running an organization, Sharrieff, and one day you read 
in the paper that someone has accused one of your employees, a very popular 
one, of doing something improper.  You have no advance notice; everybody else 
who reads the paper finds out at the same time you do, and they all start 
calling and second guessing and making conflicting demands.  So you ask the 
employee, hey, what happened?, and you don't get any answer.  Instead, his 
powerful friends start badmouthing YOU!  

  What do you do?

  Melani Lamond


  Melani,

  I'm glad you asked!  I'm a little cconcerned, but it seems easy to fix.

   I haven't been able to find a record of the second press release signed by 
any UCD spokesperson except your post.  I know Mr. Lewis Wendell was quoted 
making a public announcement of Fenton's obstruction of the internal 
investigation at the public much-discussed Penn meeting.

  I've been reading some listserv exchanges, and I know you have a lot of 
potential legal issues.  I'd feel a lot better if I could find one published 
dated record of the second official UCD press release with either Lewis 
Wendell's signature, or the UCD Board signatures, or the signature of a highly 
paid UCD flackette.

  I checked and neither press release is on the UCD web site.  Please send me 
the easiest way that I can find a record of the dated signed press release. 
Thanks.

  Here is what you posted Thursday:

  "The UCD released a second press release on Friday.  It seems not to have 
been picked up by the media.  I became aware of it through another listserv 
member, and I've received an OK to put it on the list:

  June 8, 2007
  University City District has made numerous documented attempts to contact 
John Fenton asking him to respond to the matter under investigation. Our calls 
and letters have gone unanswered. He still remains on paid administrative 
leave."



  Your concerned friend and ethics advocate,

  Glenn




  **************************************
  See what's free at http://www.aol.com. 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
  Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.17/850 - Release Date: 6/15/2007 
11:31 AM

Reply via email to