In one post, a writer poses *nine questions* to the listserve. Perhaps the
writer feels powerful when posing questions to others.
Yet the writer has ignored most of the last *19 questions* posed to him by
any UC-list subscriber. Asking is a one-way street, he asserts.
Ray is wrong. In the long run, the right to ask questions is tied to the
duty to answer questions. Those of us who ask and answer for a living
understand this well.
Until Ray answers any question of any sort for us as we request, I'd suggest
we avoid acting like any of his questions merit any answers.
-- Tony West
Ray questioned:
(but wait, are you saying that's how it actually happened? according to
ucd? how do we know? is it the full story? for example, has wendell asked
the other ucd employees who were also involved with the malcolm x park
incident? how would we know? because ucd would tell us or because you
would tell us? etc. etc.)
yes, the situation is difficult, but wendell is ultimately responsible.
ucd's existence as a non-profit, its credibility, its relationship with
the community, with blackwell, with penn, the justification for a nid --
these and more are all at stake. responsible leadership is crucial. what,
indeed, do you do?
for example, was releasing a 2nd press release about fenton in the form of
a quotation he knew/didn't know would be publicized in tony's article the
best way for wendell to behave responsibly?
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
