Not much. Besides, my point, which you conveniently ignored, was that
responding to him fuels the fire and creates more ranting. Both of
you are somehow compelled to reply to each other. One of you just
uses more words.
Frankus
Sleek. Edgy. Infinitely flexible.
On Aug 6, 2007, at 04:46 PM, Mike V. wrote:
There's a difference between mad ranting and contentious name-calling.
- Mike V.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 4:23 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [UC] Car jacking confirmation
On Aug 6, 2007, at 03:28 PM, Mike V. wrote:
Lady, you're barking up the wrong tree. I never said I hated
garbage.
I never said I didn't want contention.
But you did say this:
Glenn's ranting takes up my bandwidth, my time and my attention.
Banning him isn't censorship. It's hygiene.
That amounts to the same thing. Yet you continue to contribute to the
"unhygienic" nature of this list by engaging Glenn in conversation,
even resorting to name-calling.
Frankus
Sleek. Edgy. Infinitely flexible.
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.