Unfortunately, so have I. You KNOW it. I am really disturbed about the backlash from the UC Neighbors Listserv subscribers like you and Mr. Siano. Why?
I am curious about Brian Siano¹s rant about Karen Allen calling people racist after he had accused me, (for the same reason) of being one of the reasons Kyle formed the UC Neighbors Listserv. His invective does not seem innocuous about race. Neither does Bruce Anderson¹s account, nor FX Winkler¹s earlier post about Sharrieff Ali being a truly scary man. On 8/6/07 6:00 PM, "Mike V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Come on, Wilma. I've always taken potshots where I felt they were warranted. > > - Mike V. >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> On Behalf Of Wilma de Soto >> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 5:56 PM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; UnivCity listserv >> Subject: Re: [UC] Car jacking confirmation >> >> Quite right about Melani. She expressed her view without being nasty about >> it. >> >> Her incident with the police at 46th & Market seemed plausible. >> >> Is the new list only to take nasty potshots at those of us on the UC >> Listserv, only to be sweetness and light on the UC Neighbors at Penn >> Listserv? >> >> And if so, then why? >> >> >> On 8/6/07 11:51 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> In a message dated 8/6/2007 11:35:23 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >>> >>>> Are you sure we have a police problem, and not a deranged list busybody >>>> with delusions of grandeur and a persecution complex problem? >>> Mike: >>> >>> I notice that you're on the civil citizens' list at sweetbarkingcheese.com >>> -- so apparently you somehow don't approve of the gratuitous insults and >>> antagonism admittedly shown too often on the UC list. >>> >>> I haven't read your posts over there, but assume you've adopted a persona >>> more suitable for the tea and crumpets crowd that joined it -- else why >>> would you have signed up and why would the censors have let your messages >>> through? >>> >>> So why the totally unnecessary nastiness here? OK, Glenn admittedly went a >>> bit overboard after trying to get the facts from the copskies and being >>> given false information. But, when he found out that he was mislead by >>> Philadelphia's finest, he posted what seems like a sincere correction. And >>> you either can't find it in your heart to let it go without a mean-spirited >>> response, or even to say something pleasant to encourage the kind of posts >>> you purport to want by going to the other list. >>> >>> I noticed, by the way, that Melani Lamond is also posting to >>> sweetbarkingcheese.com. But her post this morning on this list, in response >>> to something by Al Airone, was useful and took no potshots whatever at >>> people who have chimed in on the carjacking topic with whom we know she >>> doesn't always see eye-to-eye. >>> >>> Always at your service & ready for a dialog, >>> Al Krigman >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL.com >>> <http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour/?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000982> . >>> >> >
