Wilma, ?? I think it's natural to consider that what happens behind closed doors is suspect and bad.? But that's an assumption. ?? Luckily, the other list has not had much discussion on the hotel.? It would be annoying to have to sort through stacks of cross posted messages!? I can assure you that people on the other list are not sitting there whispering about people on this list. ??? I don't know why the change was made since it was not discussed there.? I suspect that the "evesdropping" by people on this list who don't like the other list but feel compelled to monitor it was getting annoying to someone.? But it doesn't much matter.? There are open lists and closed lists.? I belong to lists that not only vet members, but sanction them if they disclose posts to non members.? I belong to open lists.? Its not about fairness, but different approaches. ??? And most importantly, as you know, you are welcome to join the other list.? Join it, read it, get bored.? Just joking.? My point is that the you have the key to the door.? But judging by your criticism of those who joined the other list, that'd be hard to do.? But trust me, no one would hold it against you if you don't.
Paul -----Original Message----- From: Wilma de Soto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; UnivCity listserv <[email protected]> Sent: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 7:31 am Subject: Re: [UC] Recent Restriction Actually, If this is the case, I find this to be most revealing of all. UC Neighbors indeed. It is unfair, in my opinion, for their members to be able to access comments on this listserv, (subscribed or not), but not the reverse. I consider this especially serious since UCNeighbors presents itself as a community listserv alternative to THIS listserv where more civil discourse is the key. The timing of this restriction also speaks volumes. For those who ARE subscribed there, my opinion is this: I see little reason to restrict access to conversations about coffee shops, new restaurants, Curio Theater, Calvary Crossroads, house mice etc. The discussion must be taking a decidedly different, less civil and perhaps more belligerent turn where the UC Listserv is concerned for the archives to suddenly be restricted. I consider this so especially in light of the results of February 13th Zoning meeting and the subsequent nature of posts here on THIS listserv by some of their subscribers. If I am mistaken about this, I am prepared to apologize to all concerned via this listserv and say no more about it. However, I would like to see for myself if this is not the case. As it stands now I am unable to do that and if I could, how would one know if some of the more strident anti-UC listserv posts were filtered or removed before one is allowed access. Wilma I just tried to view the archives of kyle's list, and arrived here: http://lists.asc.upenn.edu/mailman/private/ucneighbors/ "ucneighbors Private Archives Authentication" the archives of kyle's list are now private, apparently. On 2/20/08 12:21 AM, "UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just tried to view the archives of kyle's list, and > arrived here: > > http://lists.asc.upenn.edu/mailman/private/ucneighbors/ > > "ucneighbors Private Archives Authentication" > > > the archives of kyle's list are now private, apparently. ---- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see <http://www.purple.com/list.html>. ________________________________________________________________________ More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! - http://webmail.aol.com
