Traffic was one of the most frequently-expressed concerns I've heard
community members raise about this project at two meetings. It also has
a large potential impact on public infrastructure, as well as on
community members who don't live right next to a project. Traffic is a
meat-and-potatoes city-planning problem. It would be odd indeed if PCPC
did not consider traffic at this site.
It's possible PCPC chose to decide the traffic question in September,
after reviewing the traffic study, rather than in April, before
reviewing the traffic study. Studies are studied by some people before
making up their minds, and city planners are under permanent pressure to
read and consider studies.
-- Tony West
UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN wrote:
why, then, was traffic so important for pcpc to consider? and why was
traffic more important to pcpc than the hotel's height and scale? and
why was traffic so overridingly important for pcpc to consider in
september, but not in april?
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
