Dear neighbors,

 This is the very crucial disclaimer I found at the end of Synatek's product 
safety sheet for granular fertilizer.  This is how the corporation can 
deceptively market these products as safe.  They just say, buried in the 
details, none of it may be true!  

UCD/FOCP should explain why it is making claims that this is safe?  And why 
does UCD/FOCP disregard the importance of good notification prior to a lengthy 
drying period, 48 hours?  Whether this one product used in the park is safe in 
the environment or not, following the minimum practises for public notification 
and safety is on UCD.  That's pretty clear in this disclaimer too.  (Remember, 
this is only the first product, which has been identified, in the "lawn care" 
being put in the park)  It's not on the trugreen web site, this is a Material 
data safety sheet

http://www.synateksolutions.com/MSDS/GreenGro%20MSDS%20Template.doc

 
"DISCLAIMER
 

      The data presented herein is believed accurate for the specific material, 
but is in no way guaranteed.  The information herein may not be applicable if 
this specific material is used in combination with other material(s). SynaTek 
assumes no liability and makes no warranty in connection with any use for this 
specific material.  Other safety measures in addition to those indicated may be 
required.  The user, therefore, assumes full responsibility, both as to persons 
and to property, for the safe use of these materials."



Other issue:

(Countering Siano's straw man: "TruGreen is the nation's largest lawn and 
landscape company, serving more than 2.5 million residential and commercial 
customers across the United States with lawn care, tree and shrub care, and 
landscaping services"  I didn't record the citation, but I also remember seeing 
the figure, 70 million gallons used across the country.   The basic info about 
Trugreen is readily verifiable with a simple search.  
It's prepostorous to suggest that I would try to convince Craig that millions 
of gallons were dumped on Clark Park!  Siano's straw man is suggesting that I 
have some sinister purpose to discovering the truth and finally obtaining good 
information for all of us.)

I've been taking a lot of personal abuse for pursuing information on these 
chemicals used for 6 or 7 years in Clark park. 

Siano's quote:
Oh, I have to mention something that's very disturbing. Glenn has made wild and 
unsupported claims that "millions of gallons" of "poisons" are being dumped in 
the park, as a "corporate" effort to promote "neo-Victorian" values. I have not 
seen anyone demand that he support these claims with anything like proof. But 
when Tony tries to answer these wild accusations-- and we're researching the 
issue, trust me-- suddenly the people who swallowed Glenn's dishonest bile are 
demanding "facts and data." Well, we're trying, but they take time to assemble: 
Glenn has the luxury of throwing whatever he wants onto the list, relevant, 
documented, or not. 





----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to