|
Like Al mentioned, no one knew about a panel discussion with this sneaky "community" for an audience.. I was on campus a good part of the day and saw no announcements for the Penn community. (I went to the well publisized panel discussion on Romanticism which introduced a new anthology--much better than a room full of the anointed!)
Community panelist, Barry, explained these types of community/university gatherings during the push for the hotel. The meetings are "open and public," but they aren't announced. It makes perfect sence to the anointed! But others might think of the body functions of the male bovine.
The bit about the half empty seats was nice propaganda reinforcing what Karen noticed. The U. business geniuses portray Philadelphians as helpless cretins always asking for Penn's charity. By claiming that the audience was made of community members, who didn't bother to show up, we are also portrayed as ungrateful, uncaring, helpless cretins!
DP readers have no way to know that the panel discussion was never announced to the community. (The Arthur Ross gallery would have had a packed room full of our neighbors willing to expose the truth about Penn/community partnerships!) Today's, propaganda nicely dovetailed with the image of ungrateful cretins. (We pigs won't let the families of sick children into the neighorhood while Tom and Ed are too sweet to comment.) This was a nice one two propaganda punch! These "journalists" have been shamlessly used, and they should be ashamed of their "articles." But I believe there is more than the hotel on the horizon.
When you look at Ira Harkavy's work and hear him speak, he lays out the correct methods for creating good community partnerships. At a talk about the time of the first master plan steering committee for Clark Park, 2002, I explained to him that the Penn neo-colonialists unleashed on West Philly did the opposite of the methods he eloquenly described! In the answer to the question I posed he also gave a great answer. (Using secrecy and trickery while excluding community stakeholders will lead to bad plans and community divisiveness. By keeping an open discussion table for stakeholders and being honest, inclusive, and transparent; you can get good plans and partnerships. Even those stakeholders, who do not prevail on points during the discussions, will approve a plan they know was arrived at fairly and democratically with their participation.)
I want to see what Harkavy will say publicly when presented with the real stories from the real community! I'm sure the panel discussion with Barry, Harkavy, and this hidden community was inspiring and uplifting! (They used a tutoring program between students and school kids as the example of Penn's charititable partnerships.) I think this is only the beginning of a new rampage by the Penn spin machine. There is something bigger than the 10 story hotel coming our way. As Harkavy alluded, these Penn parnerships over top of West Philly are very important to the university!
Glenn PS: For years I went into the Philadelphia community as a representative from Penn. Like the grad student said, the population and professionals were suspicious of Penn people, often for good reason. But those barriers came down easily for me. People have good instincts, and the students need to consider what baggage they bring with them from the elite campus instead of attributing the suspicions all to prejudice.
-----Original Message--------- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see |
Title: Re: [UC] They're B-a-a-c-k [Was] Penn and the community
