I had to revisit this post from last year.  It's still relevant...
 

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Urban Development 101 [Was [UC] citypaper weighs in on Campus Inn vs. 
"doing nothing"]
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 02:51:14 -0500



" But what began with strong democratic credo has evolved in so many cases into 
a rigid NIMBY "No!" As a result, according to Tom Lussenhop, who teaches urban 
development at Princeton and who hopes to build a Hilton Homewood Suites hotel 
near the busy trolley portal on 40th Street.....
 
 
Wait a minute....Tom Lussenhop TEACHES???!!!
 
I can see it now:
 
"OK Class,
Welcome to Urban Development 101. I'm Tom Lussenhop, and I will be your 
instructor.
 
Please open your books: 
 
Step One:   Get in cahoots with a  Deep-Pockets Entity (DPE) that has (or at 
least thinks it has) a lot of political power so that they can throw a lot of 
lucrative work your way, and can ram your projects down everyone else's throat. 
 Universities usually fit this bill really well.  
 
Step Two: The DPE is not going to make you rich without expecting something in 
return.   Be willing to be a shill for DPE and build projects that they don't 
want to be directly associated with, so that if anything hits the fan (if you 
know what I mean) they will not have to sully whatever is left of their 
reputation (see the  handout entitled "Black Bottom").
 
Step Three: Identify the self-important "leaders" (SIL) of the community 
surrounding DPE's place of business.  Ideally, these will be people who rely on 
DPE for referrals of their professional services, or for business leads, or for 
tenants for their apartments, or whatever, and will do anything to ensure that 
their gravy train does not get derailed. They will be needed to rubberstamp 
your project, and to run interference for you with the municipal govenment, 
pesky neighbors and the like.   
 
Step Four: Create a project that is totally out of character, scale and 
proportion to everything in the area where it will be placed.  
 
Step Five: Arrange for the SILs to hold unnanounced "public" meetings.  Be sure 
that the meeting is scheduled for a Thursday at 3:30 AM at a location at the 
opposite end of the municipality.  Give plenty of advance notice for the 
meeting using a medium that can be reasonably expected to reach the widest 
possible audience.  Broadcasting notice of the meeting on the local public 
access cable channel one hour before the meeting is held is sufficient notice.  
(Note:  Showing up unannounced to previously scheduled meetings is a good 
technique, also.  Please be sure that you are NOT placed on the agenda.)
 
Step Six:  Hold the meeting, to be conducted by the SILs.  Have them 
rubberstamp your project.  
 
Step Seven:  When the inevitable oppostion arises from the long-term residents, 
have the SILs sell your project to their neighbors. Have the SILs stress how 
your sewage treatment plant (or airplane runway, slaughterhouse, or whatever it 
is you were told to build) will improve the craphole they're now living in.  
 
Step Eight:  If there are persistent pains-in-the-asses who are going around 
trying to stir up trouble by writing opinion letters to the local newspapers or 
listservs, try to isolate them. They're probably just too stupid to realize 
what wonderful benefits (and JOBS--don't forget jobs!)  your sewage treatment 
plant will bring.  Inviting them for coffee one-on-one is a good technique. 
That way you can destroy their credibility.
 
Step Nine:  When the neighbors complain that they weren't consulted, have the 
SILs tell everyone that if they were too lazy to watch the public access cable 
channel at 2:30 in the morning and get their asses across town to the meeting, 
then that's just too bad.  If the neighbors still won't shut the fuck up, have 
the SIL's call them nasty names, like "cheap", "greedy", and the ever-popular 
"NIMBY".
 
Step Ten:  Go to the municipal authorities and tell them how everyone at the 
public meeting supported your project 100 percent.  Get your pemits, then 
build!"
 
 



----- Original Message ----- 
From: [email protected] 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 10:34 PM
Subject: [UC] citypaper weighs in on Campus Inn vs. "doing nothing"

.....Opponents of the hotel also probably missed last week's citypaper Guest 
Commentary on "doing nothing" in Philadelphia:

http://www.citypaper.net/articles/2008/02/28/strait-talk
Strait Talk
What can we learn from Sicily and Tunisia?
by Nathaniel Popkin

Published: Feb 27, 2008

Doing nothing is de facto community planning in Philadelphia. It didn't start 
that way. In the 1960s neighborhood groups were empowered to promote their own 
ideas. But what began with strong democratic credo has evolved in so many cases 
into a rigid NIMBY "No!" As a result, according to Tom Lussenhop, who teaches 
urban development at Princeton and who hopes to build a Hilton Homewood Suites 
hotel near the busy trolley portal on 40th Street, "Nothing good has been built 
in some neighborhoods since the Great Depression."

                                          

Reply via email to