Actually, Wilma, it is not I who have made an assertion UCD *did not do*
something bad; it it you (it now appears) who are making an assertion
UCD *did do* something bad. The burden of proof does fall on you, as the
accuser. Show us your evidence, please.
If you have no evidence, you should make no accusations. The mere fact
UCD /could have asked /L&I to do something, is no evidence it /did ask
/L&I to do something.
After all:/ you too, Wilma, could have asked /L&I to crack down on
restaurants along Baltimore Ave./ Can/ /you prove /you didn't? Should we
demand you prove you didn't?
-- Tony West
On 5/17/2010 8:39 PM, Wilma de Soto wrote:
Don't you DARE to ask me to prove anything because YOU have made this
assertion. I want to see YOUR proof that L&I is just doing its job
and this initiative would not augment the agenda of the UCD, etc. nor
be right up the alley of the "politically connected" as L&I has
usually served.
