For the record I NEVER said the UCD did anything bad. I have asked L&I to crack down on MANY things over the years only to be ignored; including a house that was collapsing next door to my late mother¹s house for over five years, which caved in at 2 AM when she was 85 and living alone.
This is not a debate. I want YOU to prove that L&I did NOT come, after all these many years, because of the UCD. No back and forth please. Since I did not make the assertion that it was business as usual, I have NO burden of proof whatsoever! I MEAN it! On 5/17/10 9:08 PM, "Anthony West" <[email protected]> wrote: > Actually, Wilma, it is not I who have made an assertion UCD did not do > something bad; it it you (it now appears) who are making an assertion UCD did > do something bad. The burden of proof does fall on you, as the accuser. Show > us your evidence, please. > > If you have no evidence, you should make no accusations. The mere fact UCD > could have asked L&I to do something, is no evidence it did ask L&I to do > something. > > After all: you too, Wilma, could have asked L&I to crack down on restaurants > along Baltimore Ave. Can you prove you didn't? Should we demand you prove you > didn't? > > -- Tony West > > > > On 5/17/2010 8:39 PM, Wilma de Soto wrote: >> Re: [UC] UCD is innocent Don¹t you DARE to ask me to prove anything because >> YOU have made this assertion. I want to see YOUR proof that L&I is just >> doing its job and this initiative would not augment the agenda of the UCD, >> etc. nor be right up the alley of the ³politically connected² as L&I has >> usually served. >> > >
