Marketing and branding the half million dollars for the Clark Park redesign as "grants" worked very well for the plutocracy.

This technique is used a great deal in our empire to funnel taxpayer money to connected organizations! The common people are always told to shut up and rally to "win" these grants, as if citizens are cheering for their hometown baseball team! But the park redesign would have been seen as extreme pork, if it were honestly reported as taxpayer money!


Now that the Clark Park redesign actually sits in front of us, have folks been thinking about how that half million dollars of taxpayer money was spent???? It seems like a ridiculous cost, when you look at the gravel pit and yellow grass.

However, if you remember that corporate universities take a 2/3 cut of grant money, the cost of the redesign makes more sense! (The 2/3 cut was publicly exposed with the "grants" for the upscale lighting on Baltimore Ave. Those familiar with Penn grant formulas know this 60/40 ratio.)

I wish people would recognize that privatization always costs the masses, who pay taxes, MORE AND GIVES THEM LESS. (The deadly corporate health insurance system is a classic example.) Instead of the city government controlling the park, layers of contractors and subcontractors all extract more profits from the remaining 1/3 of all available taxpayer monies.

Please look at the new Clark Park and think of how absurd a half million dollars sounds! It doesn't matter if you see the redesign as destruction or improvement.

Was the redesign worth half a million? Could half a million have been more beneficial for basic maintenance in the neglected recreation centers around the city? Do "market solutions" ever bring greater efficiency for public needs at lower cost, or is that always a lie told by those hungry for profit and power? Should grants really be thought of as "free money?"

With open eyes,
Glenn



----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to