On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 5:32 PM, aomighty <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't quite understand what your description of the bug means. What > exactly is the problem? If the question is "Is this bug fixed in Jaunty?", the answer is yes. I installed Jaunty and verified those bugs are not present.
We've just released gmpy v1.04 that fixes some uncommon bugs and includes some performance improvements. If I can be any assistance, please let me know. casevh > > Alessio Treglia wrote: >> Can you confirm this bug on jaunty? >> >> ** Changed in: python-gmpy (Ubuntu) >> Status: New => Incomplete >> > > -- > errors on 64-bit platform > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243141 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in “python-gmpy” source package in Ubuntu: Incomplete > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: python-gmpy > > There are two serious bugs on 64-bit platforms. The bugs impact all releases > of gmpy prior to v1.03 on any 64-bit platform. > > 1) gmpy.mpz(2**32) returns 0 > > 2) hash() returns a 32-bit value but it should return a 64-bit value. > > These bugs, and a few others, are fixed in the recent gmpy v1.03 release. > > I am one of the maintainers of gmpy so please let me know if there is > anything I can do to get the fixes implemented. > > Thanks, > > casevh > -- errors on 64-bit platform https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243141 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs -- universe-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
