According to my slimserver software and my router, my two squeezeboxes are at 192.168.1.107 and 192.168.1.108.
However, a port scanner (http://www.angryziber.com/ipscan/) I use shows two active IP addresses (outside of the DHCP range) at 192.168.1.154 and 192.168.1.156. When I nmap them, I get a huge surprise: Code: -------------------- # nmap -sS -O 192.168.1.154 Starting Nmap 4.03 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2006-07-16 09:44 PDT Warning: OS detection will be MUCH less reliable because we did not find at least 1 open and 1 closed TCP port All 1674 scanned ports on 192.168.1.154 are: closed MAC Address: 00:04:20:06:01:7C (Slim Devices) Too many fingerprints match this host to give specific OS details Nmap finished: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 11.791 seconds # nmap -sS -O 192.168.1.107 Starting Nmap 4.03 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2006-07-16 09:44 PDT Warning: OS detection will be MUCH less reliable because we did not find at least 1 open and 1 closed TCP port All 1674 scanned ports on 192.168.1.107 are: closed MAC Address: 00:04:20:06:01:7C (Slim Devices) Too many fingerprints match this host to give specific OS details Nmap finished: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 4.154 seconds # -------------------- And I get similar identical results from 192.168.1.108 and 192.168.1.156. Are my squeezeboxes using two IP addresses for a reason? ... of course the fact that neither the router nor slimserver report the 192.168.1.15x addresses makes me think the port scanner might be goofy. I don't know ... -- woodp ------------------------------------------------------------------------ woodp's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=107 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=25561 _______________________________________________ unix mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/unix
