soundcheck wrote: > No, I won't at this point in time. > Recent discussions show that the whole SOA project, or better, > underlying ArchLinuxARM is all but stable. It's really WorkInProgress. > I've got problems myself to keep track. > > He did implement some mods or slightly adapted them. > Beside that there have been ARCH gcc compiler and kernel upgrades (on > RPI at least). > As far as I see it the related changes should cause slightly better > system efficiency. > > I bet, you'd like to have' em all. ;) > > As soon as things around SOA stabilize (I let you know) , you'll find a > SOA-Tune article on my blog. > I'll focus pretty much on the RPI B+ since that one is currently my No.1 > ARM playback device.
So are you using RPI B+ with the latest SoA code or just another flavor of Linux with just Squeezelite on top? Which part of Archlinux is unstable? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Kuro's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=16701 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=101624 _______________________________________________ unix mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
