soundcheck wrote: > You're not 100% right. > > "dither -S" allows for slightly sloped dithering. And it's available > for all samplerates. > The difference (IMO improvement on the first glance) over native > "dither" is clearly audible. > > I'll also try 24bit. The DAC has to support it though. Quite often 24bit > (3LE vs 4LE ) is causing problems. > > I came up with above examples so that people can play around with > easier. > > How do you change the dithering depth? I guess you talk about the > precision option "-p". I havn't found much documentation about it. > > Basically a "-p 22" (22 bit for maximum real world precision) might > even do. ( I have to generate the spectrograms to see what's > happening) > > > I'm using my own compiled sox - also on LMS - btw.
Sorry, never intended to say -S is not working at > 48Khz, but that "most of noise shaping" in SOX does not. -S still works, and noise shaping works too, but only with "slope TDPF" algorithm, that is diferent than the 'default' one. If you could appreciate differences between dithers and more if you exit at <= 48 Khz I really suggets you to try noise shaping. Yes, -p is the option intended for the case you pointed out. ____________________________________________________________ SB+, Klimo Merlino + Kent Gold, Monitor Audio Studio 20 Gold SE+, Klimo reference and DIS Interconnect. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ marcoc1712's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=34842 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97046 _______________________________________________ unix mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
