mherger wrote: 
> Could a docker image be smart enough to install an architecture 
> dependent package?
I, for one, do not understand the question.

When running an image, the container can know its arch; but in-container
update isn't mainstream as it breaks the promise of repeatability.
When building an image, the target arch would be known
When pulling an image for the first time, the host's arch is selected by
default; Another arch can be requested, a non-runnable image would
install
When pulling an image to check for updates before running, the same arch
as the local version is requested



2 SB 3 • 1 PCP 6 • Libratone Loop, Zipp, Zipp Mini • iPeng (iPhone +
iPad) • LMS 7.9 (linux) with plugins: CD Player, WaveInput, Triode's BBC
iPlayer by bpa • IRBlaster by Gwendesign (Felix) • Smart Mix, Music Walk
With Me, What Was That Tune? by Michael Herger • PowerSave by Jason
Holtzapple • Song Info, Song Lyrics by Erland Isaksson • AirPlay Bridge
by philippe_44 • WeatherTime by Martin Rehfeld • Auto Dim Display,
SaverSwitcher, ContextMenu by Peter Watkins.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
epoch1970's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=16711
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=111828

_______________________________________________
unix mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix

Reply via email to