model to get, for example, Spotify to work correctly?

Please define correctly ;-). It would certainly work as is, but you'd have to enter credentials, and it wouldn't be seen by anybody but the authenticated user. That's a limitation indeed.

This is a first version of the image. I could imagine we could have more images. But I wouldn't know how to get mDNS working right now. Suggestions welcome (I'm sure some of the guys who helped me with the initial image already did this, and I refused to accept it for v1 :-)).

- There is no supervisor. There can be a problem with Docker ('zombie

We discussed this and came to the conclusion that an image which crashes should crash, and not hide behind some supervisor restarting it. Because if it crashes, then there's something wrong. The user better knows about it. I personally (without Docker) can't remember the last time LMS crashed. It shouldn't happen.

   processes aren't terminated'
   (https://github.com/krallin/tini/issues/8)) that manifests itself when
   the PID 1 process doesn't expect to need to look after other processes
   that are created. Could that be the case here (with plugins, etc.)? I
   have to confess I haven't tried to use -this- image, but my homespun
   Dockerfile, with a container that has been running for two weeks and
   started without an init process has over 50 instances each of 'faad',
   'flac' and 'spotty-hf' showing up in the host's 'ps -e' output as
   "defunct" processes. There is a tool ('now built into Docker'
   (https://github.com/krallin/tini#using-tini) - it just requires
   '--init' to be added to the 'docker run' command) designed to overcome
   this problem if it occurs.

But why would there be so many helpers? Because these helpers crashed, or because LMS crashed? Running LMS under a supervisor wouldn't fix the helpers crashing problem.

--

Michael
_______________________________________________
unix mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix

Reply via email to