stroom wrote: > Thank you. Now I know it is possible I will try again. I had already > tried to set http port to 9002 to avoid conflict on that port, and > server could be reached on that port. But it didn't connect to the > players. Should I change the other 3 ports settings from > ports: > - 9000:9000/tcp > - 9090:9090/tcp > - 3483:3483/tcp > - 3483:3483/udp > > to e.g (i.e. only change host ports, no change in container side > ports?: > ports: > - 9002:9002/tcp > - 9092:9090/tcp > - 3485:3483/tcp > - 3485:3483/udp > environment: > HTTP_PORT=9002
To be honest: I know begin to wonder what I did It was a while ago, testing 7 vs 8. I think I merely switched between them. 9090 is for remote control and can be changed. The others are broadcasts and should/cannot be changed I think. Maybe I did not even open those up and pointed my squeezelites directly to the proper server adress and port Better alternative is using macvlan. This gives each container its own address. Using same ports is then no problem anymore I made my dhcp range a bit smaller and created an macvlan for some in the remaining range. Then assign an ip from that macvlan to the containers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Huey11's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=67632 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=111828
_______________________________________________ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
