Hi Steve,

I have a 7300, PowerLogix G3/350, 600mb RAM, Sonnet ATA 100, Maxtor 15 
gig HD partitioned in half. OS 9.1 in second partition and OS X 10.1.3 
and 9.1 in the second.

When I installed X I did it in september with OS X 10.1 and Unspported 
Utility X 2.0
It went without a hitch.

I resently tried to put OS X on another 7300 and it never took. There 
were two big differences. The second 7300 has a Sonnet G3 card and a 
SCSI HD. I had more luck with Unspported Utility X 2.0 than with the 
Sonnet OS X software, but it still failed. When I get a ATA card in it I 
will try again. The problem seemed to revolve around the SCSI drive 
acordind to the messages produced.

You might try the older Unspported Utility X 2.0...If you can't get it I 
can send it to you.


***************************************************************************

Steve Seiden wrote:

>
>Hello Listers, I'm trying to install OSX version 10.1 on my Umax S900
>and  have failed over and over. I can't seem to figure what I'm doing
>wrong. I'll try to give as much detail as I can...I am presently
>
>The message above started a pretty good thread that has died without answers for me.  
>SCSI termination sounded like one probable conclusion, but I did not hear if Phillip 
>ever found his problem and what it was. I felt as if many were not hearing what I 
>heard, which was that using XPostFacto Phillip was never able to get the OS X 
>installer to load on his hard drive, period. I empathize, as I too cannot get 
>XPostFacto to load on my PowerMac 7300. Should be able to. Many answers mis-id'ed the 
>problems as being unable to boot in OS X, when in fact he never got it loaded in 
>order to try to boot. Am I right here Phillip?
>
>I have a $200+ PowerMac 7300 (eBay) running OS 9.1 which I have upgraded over 8 
>months with an XLR8 ZIFCarrier and Newer G4/400/1MB, new RAM to 896MB, an ACARD ATA 
>100/133, two Maxtor 7200 EIDE HDs (40GB master and 20GB slave), a TDK ATAPI 24/10/40x 
>VeloCD, and added VRAM to 4MB. I have no PCI video cards. To install the ATA HDs and 
>an ATAPI CD burner, I have removed all internal SCSI, both the original Apple 4GB (I 
>think) SCSI HD and CD-ROM. I have encountered no problems running 9.1.
>
>But, using XPostFacto, I cannot get OS X to install. Using the ATAPI TDK, I got a 
>broken folder. The TDK had not been bootable with OS 9 CDs, but had played well as a 
>straight CD-ROM with both digital and audio CDs, and burns with Toast 4/5 lite. I had 
>first suspected the OS 9 CDs with the TDK, but now believe the bootability is a drive 
>issue. So I have reinstalled the SCSI CD-ROM. It is bootable with OS 9 CDs. With 
>XPostFacto, it then gives me a happy face and a perpetual rainbow cursor, rotating, 
>but frozen in the upper left corner. Brittany suggested using verbose mode, which I 
>have tried and it freezes at the same point each time (I don't have the verbose data 
>here).
>
>Following Dan Knight's UnSupported list, I believe I may have created an internal 
>SCSI bus termination problem for myself by removing the SCSI HD and CD, which perhaps 
>XPostFacto cannot handle. Reading this thread makes me believe that I could install 
>OS X after putting the SCSI HD back in, but I don't want to go there. Before I bought 
>the 40GB, I ran the 20GB ATA with the 4GB SCSI HD. The ATA was obviously much faster, 
>so I moved OS 9.1 to the ATA and made it the boot and primary drive, and semi-retired 
>the SCSI in its installed location, waiting for another good deal on large capacity 
>ATA, recently completed.
>
>SOoo I have a quandry!! I think it is a waste to use a drive bay and a 4GB SCSI HD 
>purely as a termination block. I want a full ATA 7300 with OS X running, with my 60 
>GB fast ATA capacity, and my ATAPI burner running in my final configuration. But I 
>know nothing about internal SCSI termination. What it the proper way? Is there a 
>low-cost internal termination block similar to external SCSI termination blocks, that 
>can be permanently installed at the end of the SCSI ribbon cable? Where can I get 
>such, and what specific part am I looking for? Or can the SCSI ribbon be detached 
>from the motherboard after the SCSI CD is no longer required, resulting in no need 
>for a terminal block? Or perhaps I have another problem here to chase after the SCSI 
>is properly terminated.
>
>Thanks in advance!!
>
>Steve Seiden
>



-- 
Unsupported OS X is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/>

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

Unsupported OS X list info <http://lowendmac.com/lists/unsupported.html>
Send list messages to:     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email:     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email:    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions:    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive <http://www.mail-archive.com/unsupportedosx%40mail.maclaunch.com/>

Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com

Reply via email to