Friday at 3:53pm, Trevyn Meyer said:
Nope you all are stupid.
Well, it looks like that kind of shut down the conversation. Did you ever
get it working?
I hate to say it, and I'm not a complete expert on this topic, but I would
doubt that @ and . would be valid for a tag in XML. Your second XML uses
it, and it seems to be causing a problem. They can be inside of a pair of
tags I'm sure, but using them as the name of the tag seems bad. You could
use them as an attribute value in a tag I bet, like this:
<person id='[EMAIL PROTECTED]'>
...
</person>
Anyway, good luck. In the future, you'll probably get better results if
you don't reply rudely to people who are trying to answer a question you
asked. They're not getting anything out of it, so you might as well be
nice to people who are helping you for free, especially if you want help
in the future. I guess I assumed that was common sense and normal
etiquette, but perhaps I was wrong.
If we indeed are all stupid, do you have a reference for an XML spec that
says that @ and . are allowed in tag names, so we can educate ourselves?
Thanks,
Mac
Scott Hill wrote:
On 5/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Trevyn, I'm not sure you can use an '@' or a '.' in an xml tag, can
you? I've never even tried it. That's the first thing I'd change.
-- Cole
He's right. You can't use an email address as a tag.
--
Mac Newbold MNE - Mac Newbold Enterprises, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.macnewbold.com/
_______________________________________________
UPHPU mailing list
[email protected]
http://uphpu.org/mailman/listinfo/uphpu
IRC: #uphpu on irc.freenode.net
