> I hate to say it, and I'm not a complete expert on this topic, but I > would doubt that @ and . would be valid for a tag in XML. Your second > XML uses it, and it seems to be causing a problem. They can be inside of > a pair of tags I'm sure, but using them as the name of the tag seems > bad. You could use them as an attribute value in a tag I bet, like this:
"." are ok in tag names. here is a list of what values are acceptable if anyone is interested. sometimes you have to be careful with the version of xml and the parser. some parsers do not follow the specification completely. http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml11-20060816/#sec-starttags http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml11-20060816/#sec-common-syn -- ray _______________________________________________ UPHPU mailing list [email protected] http://uphpu.org/mailman/listinfo/uphpu IRC: #uphpu on irc.freenode.net
