> Update to something that isn't full of bugs and security holes.  FC3
> hasn't been supported (no errata) for 1.5 years and there are several
> known security issues with the version of Apache (httpd) that they last
> shipped for FC3.  I know there has to be a truly good (and grandiose,
> perhaps?) reason why you're still using FC3 and not using, say, CentOS
> 4, instead.
> 
> But seriously, your post first made me think that someone might have
> tampered with something they shouldn't have.  Though it's not likely,
> you might have a breach.

his apache is a new version he compiled. thus, there is not logrotate script
that would have been installed with the rpm version. yet, i still agree, he
needs to upgrade his distro and centos would be a sure fit here.

--
thebigdog

_______________________________________________

UPHPU mailing list
[email protected]
http://uphpu.org/mailman/listinfo/uphpu
IRC: #uphpu on irc.freenode.net

Reply via email to