Partly additional exposure, but mostly because it has a nice UI. Also,
Nabble archives lots of lists that devs (Apache and Codehaus projects)
may participate in, so its convenient to have a single interface.
Plus, as far as I know, the cost (e.g. its free) is minimal. I'm not
sure if the email list admins would incur any additional human resource
overhead or not. It seems that you just subscribe Nabble to the list
and you're done.
Elliot
Jim Helwig wrote:
Is this for additional exposure or is it because the current archives
are insufficient? Just wondering.
on 4/30/2007 10:07 AM Elliot Metsger said the following:
What are people's reaction to having uportal-dev being archived by
Nabble? (http://nabble.com)
Would anyone be opposed to having Nabble archive this list as well as
uportal-user?
Elliot
--
Join your friends and colleagues at JA-SIG with Altitude: June 24-27, 2007 in
Denver, CO USA.
Featuring keynotes by: Phil Windley, Matt Raible, Matt Asay
Sessions on topics including: CAS, uPortal, Portlets, Sakai, Identity
Management, and Open Source
For more information & registration visit:
http://www.ja-sig.org/conferences/07summer/index.html
---
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe click here:
https://lists.wisc.edu/u?id=5712631E&n=T&l=jasig-uportal-dev&o=4557600
or send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
