JimH
on 4/30/2007 11:13 AM Elliot Metsger said the following:
Partly additional exposure, but mostly because it has a nice UI. Also, Nabble archives lots of lists that devs (Apache and Codehaus projects) may participate in, so its convenient to have a single interface.Plus, as far as I know, the cost (e.g. its free) is minimal. I'm not sure if the email list admins would incur any additional human resource overhead or not. It seems that you just subscribe Nabble to the list and you're done.Elliot Jim Helwig wrote:Is this for additional exposure or is it because the current archives are insufficient? Just wondering.on 4/30/2007 10:07 AM Elliot Metsger said the following:What are people's reaction to having uportal-dev being archived by Nabble? (http://nabble.com)Would anyone be opposed to having Nabble archive this list as well as uportal-user?Elliot
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
