Re: [uportal-dev] compelling ootb JSR-168s in 2.6?

[Eric Dalquist]

The bookmarks portlet (in SVN) is very simple / easy to configure. It would just need to be configured to use the portal db.

-Eric

Andrew Petro wrote:

uPortal developers,











Andrew


--


Featuring keynotes by: Phil Windley, Matt Raible, Matt Asay

Maybe too late for Friday's RC feature-completeness deadline, but I gotta ask: Anyone have any compelling generic JSR-168s under suitable opensource licenses they'd like to ship with uP 2.6? Those JSR-168 examples we're shipping aren't totally thrilling -- I gotta believe this community has got better examples. If you can't get your portlet in for 2.6, it's not too early to commit efforts to make 2.7 sing... I'm going to take a look at Eric's Bookmarks portlet this evening, see whether that can be a quick win. Small. Simple. Quick. Low-risk. But more compelling than that Google portlet would be nice... Join your friends and colleagues at JA-SIG with Altitude: June 24-27, 2007 in Denver, CO USA. Sessions on topics including: CAS, uPortal, Portlets, Sakai, Identity Management, and Open Source For more information & registration visit: http://www.ja-sig.org/conferences/07summer/index.html

---

You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature