On Sep 17, 2007, at 3:49 PM, Andrew Petro wrote: > I wonder if it would be clearer to re-name the entire current > "uPortal 3" space to something like "uPortal Sandbox"
I think this is confusing. I think we need to make it clear that no more work is going into the codebase, and Sandbox seems ambiguous. I almost wonder if we move the pages into an Archive section of the uPortal space, and then delete the uPortal3 space. > And then I wonder whether creating a new uPortal 3 wiki space is a > good idea, or if the uPortal 3 efforts should be undertaken in the > existing uPortal wiki space. The change the project has made in > its approach to uPortal 3 is to be more evolutionary. uPortal 3 > *is* uPortal 2, cleaned up quite a bit and with pointed > improvements. So maybe, just as the existing code evolves to > become uPortal 3, the existing wiki space evolves to become a wiki > space that documents uPortal, inclusive of uPortal 3. +1 I think they key factor in our new strategy moving forward is that the New uPortal 3 is uportal -- with a direct lineage to previous efforts. Given that shift, I don't think a separate wiki space is really appropriate -- I'd rather see a linear release progression. > Likewise, I don't think it will be necessary to have an entirely > new uPortal manual, more a matter of growing and enhancing the > existing uPortal manual wiki space to document the project as it > grows and is enhanced. +1 again. Jason -- Jason Shao Application Developer Rutgers University, Office of Instructional & Research Technology v. 732-445-8726 | f. 732-445-5539 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http:// jay.shao.org -- You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
