Wow. Thanks for the comment. Sorry about not listening in for a while. I'm trying to do better. Sounds like things are still moving on in the uPortal realm.
Mark On 9/28/07, Timothy Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > we have recently been doing a lot of work with the dlm processing > pipeline to reproduce the functionality that we were able to accomplish > with minor tweaks to alm. so, we will be looking to stay involved in > the alm to dlm talks. in fact, i don't know the best way to facilitate > increased discussion and comparison of notes, but it should happen > sooner rather than later. > > i have to say... i am completely sold on dlm, and a SUPER KUDOS to mark > boyd for making this such a solid, robust, and flexible product. > > > > Andrew Petro wrote: > > "contrib" ? > > > > +1 on moving ALM out of the core uPortal SVN deliverable > > > > +1 for finding someplace more articulate than "sandbox" for it to live > > > > +1 for really, seriously, figuring out whether anyone cares about ALM > > in uPortal 3... > > > > > > ... and whether those someones are interested in going after > > opportunities like Drew Wills' sleek automated ALM-->DLM upgrade and > > enhancing DLM (perhaps via adoption of the Mark Boyd code in Sandbox) > > to meet their needs. Now that we've got a uPortal Steering Committee, > > I thnk this is a job for that committee, to engage with Unicon to > > understand the prognosis on the Academus --> Open Source uPortal using > > ALM with Open Source Plugins --> Open Source uPortal using DLM with > > Open Source Plugins upgrade path, to engage with ESUP-Portail to > > understand the prognosis for the "ESUP Distribution Uses DLM" idea. > > > > I've added this to the agenda for the steering committee bootstrapping > > conference call > > <http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/UPC/Steering+Committee>. > > > > Andrew > > > >> +1 on removing it. > >> > >> +1 on bill's comments. > >> > >> based on some previous threads, it almost seems like we need an > >> additional svn space outside of the sandbox that is more like a > >> uportal framework plug-ins or add-ons space. > >> > >> > >> > >> William G. Thompson, Jr. wrote: > >>> I think the approach is a good one, although I wonder if it would keep > >>> these a bit clearer to put the ALM code into module tree distinct from > >>> sandbox so as to keep the meaning of the sandbox "experimental, not in > >>> production, code base" clear. > >>> > >>> On 9/28/07, Eric Dalquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> In the code cleanup effort outlined for the uP3 community roadmap > I've > >>>> been removing chunks of deprecated code where prudent and doing other > >>>> minor tweaking. Some that was talked about in-depth at the conference > >>>> but not as much on this list is what to do with the ALM code. The > >>>> plan I > >>>> had worked out with several folks was to pull the ALM/integrated > modes > >>>> code out into a sandboxed project in SVN. > >>>> > >>>> The goal of this is that we do not want new installs using ALM and we > >>>> don't have plans to continue to maintain that code. That said > >>>> moving the > >>>> code into the sandbox allows someone else to step up at a later > >>>> date and > >>>> apply ALM patches and actually use the code in uPortal 3. The > >>>> sandboxed > >>>> project is designed to be an overlay of the uPortal 3 code, if > >>>> there is > >>>> interest in actually making sure that overlay is functional as we > move > >>>> forward I'm sure we could tweak the Maven build for the ALM project > to > >>>> automate that processes. > >>>> > >>>> These changes have already been made but it doesn't me they can't be > >>>> rolled back or have a different strategy taken. > >>>> > >>>> -Eric > >>>> > >>>> ALM Move: http://www.ja-sig.org/issues/browse/UP-1835 > >>>> Code Cleanup: http://www.ja-sig.org/issues/browse/UP-1832 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > -- > > You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev > > -- > You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev > -- You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
