Is it possible to use both the terms channel and portlet where appropriate?
The word portlet has already sort of been adapted imo...there's wiki pages
with the term all over the place.

I also like the term tab.

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Jen Bourey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> First of all, I probably should have clarified that I'm only looking at
> the AJAX UI, UI links, etc. at the moment, so terms like "managed fragment"
> shouldn't be of concern.  I also object to the use of "portlet" as a generic
> term.  It's driven me partially insane since the day we started using it.
>
> I'm completely OK with sticking with channel and tab, although since some
> other terminology has crept into the UI, so it seems worthwhile to solicit
> some opinions about which direction we should fix it in.  My preference
> would be to someday replace the term "channel" with something that's neither
> "channel" nor "portlet".  Ideally I'd really rather use a term that doesn't
> indicate (or mis-indicate) a backing technology.  That doesn't necessarily
> need to happen now though.
>
> - Jen
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Andrew Petro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Jen,
> >
> > I favor sticking with the historical "tab" and "channel" terminology for
> > this release.  It maximizes the re-usability of existing documentation.
> >
> > I object to "portlet" as the generic term for the dynamic boxes on the
> > screen in the uPortal documentation and terminology because it is
> > confusing in its relationship to JSR-168 Portlets.  Some of the channels
> > are implemented as JSR-168 portlets.  Some are not.  Technically, all of
> > them are "channels" and can benefit by channel things, like channel
> > types, metadata about which channel controls to show, categorization,
> > and selection of audiences permitted to subscribe to them.
> >
> > I see why implementing schools might adopt portlet, or widget, or
> > channel, or thingamabob as their local terminology.  End users don't
> > need to understand JSR-168 and the distinction of which channels are
> > JSR-168 portlets and which are not.
> >
> > The target audience of the uPortal release, however, tends more towards
> > the IT staff of higher education institutions who might adopt and
> > implement uPortal locally.  Avoiding calling things "portlets" that are
> > not "Portlets" has value for this audience.
> >
> >
> > I like the term "tab".  Using the default theme and skin, they look like
> > tabs.  I find it easier to explain this to people in terms of tabs, and
> > then tell them that if they want they could look like something other
> > than tabs.  Tabs are nicely concrete and palpable and easier to grok.  I
> > like using "managed fragment" to differentiate between DLM managed tabs
> > and end-user personal layout tabs.
> >
> > The term "page" has too much content management system expectations
> > associated with it.  uPortal *isn't* a content management system and you
> > *don't* interact with pages in the sense of Drupal or HyperContent.
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> >
> > Timothy Carroll wrote:
> > > we have implemented a bit more hierarchy than the out of box uportal.
> > >
> > > we use the terms tabs, pages, portlets
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Jen Bourey wrote:
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> In cleaning up the up3 UI, I've noticed that the terminology isn't
> > >> always consistent.  What do we want to use?  I think historically
> > >> we've used channel and tab as terms?  At Yale, we've switched to
> > >> calling those items portlets and pages, not that that's necessarily
> > >> better.
> > >>
> > >> I don't have strong feelings about what terminology we use, although
> > >> I would like to fix it to all be the same.  What would everyone
> > prefer?
> > >>
> > >> - Jen
> > >> --
> >
> >
> > --
> > Join your friends and colleagues at JA-SIG 2008 - "Higher Education
> > Solutions: The Community Source Way!"
> > April 27th - 30th, 2008 in St. Paul, Minnesota USA
> >
> > Featuring CAS, DSpace, Fedora, Fluid, Internet2, Kuali, Sakai, uPortal,
> > and more!
> > Information/Registration at:
> > http://www.ja-sig.org/conferences/08spring/index.html
> >
> > Subscribe to the conference blog, The Community Source Way
> > http://jasig2008.blogspot.com, for news and updates about the  event.
> >
> > Join the Conference networking site at
> > http://ja-sigspring08.crowdvine.com/
> >
> > You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
> > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
> >
>
> --
>
> Join your friends and colleagues at JA-SIG 2008 - "Higher Education 
> Solutions: The Community Source Way!"
> April 27th - 30th, 2008 in St. Paul, Minnesota USA
>
> Featuring CAS, DSpace, Fedora, Fluid, Internet2, Kuali, Sakai, uPortal, and 
> more!
> Information/Registration at: 
> http://www.ja-sig.org/conferences/08spring/index.html
>
> Subscribe to the conference blog, The Community Source Way
> http://jasig2008.blogspot.com, for news and updates about the event.
>
> Join the Conference networking site at http://ja-sigspring08.crowdvine.com/
>
> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
>
>

-- 
Join your friends and colleagues at JA-SIG 2008 - "Higher Education Solutions: 
The Community Source Way!"
April 27th - 30th, 2008 in St. Paul, Minnesota USA

Featuring CAS, DSpace, Fedora, Fluid, Internet2, Kuali, Sakai, uPortal, and 
more!
Information/Registration at: 
http://www.ja-sig.org/conferences/08spring/index.html

Subscribe to the conference blog, The Community Source Way
http://jasig2008.blogspot.com, for news and updates about the  event.

Join the Conference networking site at http://ja-sigspring08.crowdvine.com/

You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev

Reply via email to