Nope, I don't think much testing has been done on the skin performance.
As for validation, are they theme/skin issues or portlet/channel issues? The hard part about being a portal is there nothing the framework can do if one of the portlets on the page is rendering invalid markup.
-Eric Tuyhang Ly wrote:
Hi,Regarding the UI performance in uP3, I've seen a high number in HTTP requests and low number in primed cache reported by Firefox YSlow. For example, here is the performance report after rendering the first tab of the admin layout:*Performance Grade: F (43)* *Empty Cache* *Primed Cache* 49.9K 1 HTML/Text 173.4K 15 JavaScript Files 40.9K 16 Stylesheet Files 213.1K 24 CSS Images 569.5K 13 Images 1047.0K *Total size* *69* *HTTP requests* 49.9K 1 HTML/Text 0.0K 15 JavaScript Files 0.0K 16 Stylesheet Files 1.1K 24 CSS Images 0.0K 13 Images 51.0K *Total size* *69* *HTTP requests*Also, http://validator.w3.org/ reports 107 validation errors on this first tab of the admin page, including incorrectly nested elements, element "token" undefined, etc...Are these known issues to be addressed in the next release of uP3? | |Thanks, Tuy. -- You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
