This is the report for an empty tab:
*Empty Cache* *Primed Cache*
16.2K 1 HTML/Text
173.4K 15 JavaScript Files
40.9K 16 Stylesheet Files
18.5K 17 CSS Images
7.7K 8 Images
256.9K *Total size*
*57* *HTTP requests*
16.2K 1 HTML/Text
0.0K 15 JavaScript Files
0.0K 16 Stylesheet Files
1.1K 17 CSS Images
0.0K 8 Images
17.3K *Total size*
*57* *HTTP requests*
Jen Bourey wrote:
> Yeah, I guess I'm not convinced that for a portal, the table printed
> out really represents an "F" grade. I'd worry most about requests
> after the very first one, since the portal is intended to be an
> interactive environment. The model of optimizing for repeat requests
> also seems to fit the choices we've made in the backend as well. Some
> of the channels/portlets tend to be slow on the very first request,
> then improve as their contents are cached.
>
> If you're on the admin first tab, some of the javascript may be coming
> from the calendar channel, not from the portal itself. I'd recommend
> maybe trying the tool on an empty tab to see what's being included by
> the framework.
>
> Half of the download appears to be images, so all of that will be
> dependent on your skinning choices, as well. You could always choose
> to have a skin which doesn't use images for tabs, etc.
>
> - Jen
>
>
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Eric Dalquist
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> Also as for the performance, I'd be interested to see what YSlow
> recommends for fixing the performance problems. Your table looks
> pretty good ... we know that with an empty cache it is a large
> first hit, this is the reality that comes with people wanting a
> dynamic user-interface. The primed cache shows one CSS file being
> loaded and the portal content being loaded, I'm not what else
> could be done to improve performance out-of-the-box there. I'd
> imagine setting some agressive cache headers may help cut down on
> the number of requests but there is some significant implications
> in doing that around people doing development work, future changes
> to those files and container/http-server compatibility. I'd be
> very interested to hear suggestions for how to improve that rating.
>
> -Eric
>
>
> --
>
> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
--
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
