So, how about that uPortal 4.1 release?

Anyone aware of defects in 4.1 RC2, unfixed on master, that are so
significant they ought to block a 4.1 GA release?

There are no BLOCKER issues tagged as affecting 4.1.0:

http://goo.gl/SV6mJV

And there are no unresolved BLOCKER issues tagged as fix-for 4.1.0:

http://goo.gl/4lxwND

So.  Anyone intend to fix something soon in master so important it ought to
hold up 4.1.0?  Or are we at that post-conference point of good to cut
4.1.0 whenever release engineering attentions can be applied?




On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Drew Wills <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 04/17/2014 01:22 PM, Andrew Petro wrote:
>
>>
>> Who's got in flight features that they desperately want included in 4.1
>> such that it's worth further delay before feature freeze and squishing?
>> Or are we all on board for this?
>>
>
> I would love to get the Tenant Manager/Milti-Tenancy stuff sponsored by
> IlliniCloud in.
>
> It's...
>
>   - Non-invasive;  use of it is completely optional, and adding it doesn't
> change existing components
>   - Pretty well baked at this point
>
> I'd like to organize a pull request for it asap.
>
> drew
>
>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
>

-- 
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev

Reply via email to